The "New" NWP Discussions - Northwestern Pacific Railroad Network2024-03-28T18:08:08Zhttp://nwprr.net/group/thenewnwp/forum?feed=yes&xn_auth=noThe NWPRR website is pathetictag:nwprr.net,2011-08-21:3290209:Topic:390932011-08-21T21:03:19.653ZAl Merkrebshttp://nwprr.net/profile/AlMerkrebs
<p>Sorry,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I gotta call a spade a spade. IMHO, they should take their site down until there is actually something on it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled that NWPRR is running again, but they seem to have no public relations whatsoever. Come on, NWPRR, get your pr act together!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>-Al</p>
<p>Sorry,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I gotta call a spade a spade. IMHO, they should take their site down until there is actually something on it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled that NWPRR is running again, but they seem to have no public relations whatsoever. Come on, NWPRR, get your pr act together!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>-Al</p> Cabooses, or 3-crew members???tag:nwprr.net,2009-08-09:3290209:Topic:19152009-08-09T02:53:01.000ZBill Bramscherhttp://nwprr.net/profile/BillBramscher
08/08/09 2150-cdt<br />
<br />
I believe that Class-I and any other rail transportation company have at least 3-crew members to ensure optimal safety conditions; Engineer, Foreman/Conductor, &, Switchman/<br />
Brakeman.<br />
<br />
I also believe that the FRA should regulate ton/mile spec's so that railroads would prioritize<br />
business instead to answering to stockholders.<br />
<br />
Anyone have any thoughts?<br />
WLB
08/08/09 2150-cdt<br />
<br />
I believe that Class-I and any other rail transportation company have at least 3-crew members to ensure optimal safety conditions; Engineer, Foreman/Conductor, &, Switchman/<br />
Brakeman.<br />
<br />
I also believe that the FRA should regulate ton/mile spec's so that railroads would prioritize<br />
business instead to answering to stockholders.<br />
<br />
Anyone have any thoughts?<br />
WLB